[DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

Baptiste MATHUS-4
OK, forking another thread to specifically talk about Codehaus JIRA to GitHub issues migration.

Just had a quick look at Google, and the other way comes first. Not much JIRA -> GH Issues... Not yet asked GH support, I suppose there might be something already exisiting.

We also want to talk about the dirty details: how to try and keep as much as information we can, the comments posters id, the JIRA numbers somewhere to be indexable, and so on.

Anyone having done something approaching in the past is also welcome to chime in.

Thanks

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
Date: 2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration
To: [hidden email]


ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
(and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo project" on
our website once migrated)


I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus

what are the next steps?

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> then we have a few proposals:
> - Mojo Extras
> - MojoHaus
> - The Mojo Project
>
>
> I really like MojoHaus
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The
> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and used
> > in the Maven community.
> >
> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
> > Project".
> >
> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
> > >
> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license
> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes at a
> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
> > > rules
> > > are done for)
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
> > > Codehaus
> > > is really wide
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
> > > > Hello Hervé,
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers (who
> > > > are
> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or even
> > > > abbreviated - name.
> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the
> > > > aspectj
> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
> > > >
> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
> > > > (actually,
> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
> > > > Mojo
> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the
> > > > genereal development community.
> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
> > > >
> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
> > > > organisation,
> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
> > > >
> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason
> > > > that
> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
> > > > projects
> > > > themselves.
> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project should
> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that we
> > > > should
> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
> > > >
> > > > Fair?
> > > >
> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
> > > > > > *Project name*
> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than
> > > > > > later.
> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be
> > > > > > technical
> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
> > > > > > Codehaus
> > > > > > EOL
> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
> > > > > > btw)?
> > > > > > Or
> > > > > > change the project name even more?
> > > > >
> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be
> > > > > precise)
> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
> > > > >
> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
> > > > > need
> > > > > for
> > > > > "XXX
> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hervé
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

Robert Scholte-3
Paul Hammant(cc) did a Jira export for QDox[1]
IMHO that's complete enough.
If we agree on such approach, Paul can probably help us or give the  
instructions how he did it.

thanks,
Robert

[1] http://paul-hammant.github.io/Old_Qdox_Issues/


Op Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:14:52 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus <[hidden email]>:

> OK, forking another thread to specifically talk about Codehaus JIRA to
> GitHub issues migration.
>
> Just had a quick look at Google, and the other way comes first. Not much
> JIRA -> GH Issues... Not yet asked GH support, I suppose there might be
> something already exisiting.
>
> We also want to talk about the dirty details: how to try and keep as much
> as information we can, the comments posters id, the JIRA numbers  
> somewhere
> to be indexable, and so on.
>
> Anyone having done something approaching in the past is also welcome to
> chime in.
>
> Thanks
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
> Date: 2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration
> To: [hidden email]
>
>
> ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
> (and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo  
> project"
> on
> our website once migrated)
>
>
> I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus
>
> what are the next steps?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
>> then we have a few proposals:
>> - Mojo Extras
>> - MojoHaus
>> - The Mojo Project
>>
>>
>> I really like MojoHaus
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
>> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form.  
>> The
>> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and
> used
>> > in the Maven community.
>> >
>> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
>> > Project".
>> >
>> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
>> > >
>> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for  
>> license
>> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes  
>> at
> a
>> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
>> > > rules
>> > > are done for)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
>> > > Codehaus
>> > > is really wide
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Hervé
>> > >
>> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
>> > > > Hello Hervé,
>> > > >
>> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers
> (who
>> > > > are
>> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
>> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or
> even
>> > > > abbreviated - name.
>> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say  
>> "the
>> > > > aspectj
>> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
>> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
>> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
>> > > >
>> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
>> > > > (actually,
>> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
>> > > > Mojo
>> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
>> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to  
>> the
>> > > > genereal development community.
>> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
>> > > >
>> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
>> > > > organisation,
>> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the  
>> reason
>> > > > that
>> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
>> > > > projects
>> > > > themselves.
>> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project  
>> should
>> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
>> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that  
>> we
>> > > > should
>> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
>> > > >
>> > > > Fair?
>> > > >
>> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>:
>> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
>> > > > > > *Project name*
>> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner
> than
>> > > > > > later.
>> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not  
>> be
>> > > > > > technical
>> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we  
>> use
>> > > > > > for
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > project.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
>> > > > > > Codehaus
>> > > > > > EOL
>> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo
> org)?
>> > > > > > or
>> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
>> > > > > > btw)?
>> > > > > > Or
>> > > > > > change the project name even more?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to
> be
>> > > > > precise)
>> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
>> > > > >
>> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
>> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
>> > > > > need
>> > > > > for
>> > > > > "XXX
>> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hervé
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > -
>> > > > >
>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> > >
>> > >  
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

Bugzilla from joerg.schaible@gmx.de
Hi Robert,

Robert Scholte wrote:

> Paul Hammant(cc) did a Jira export for QDox[1]
> IMHO that's complete enough.
> If we agree on such approach, Paul can probably help us or give the
> instructions how he did it.
>
> thanks,
> Robert
>
> [1] http://paul-hammant.github.io/Old_Qdox_Issues/

Look here:
http://paulhammant.com/2015/03/20/jira-static-extract-script/

Cheers,
Jörg

>
>
> Op Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:14:52 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus
> <[hidden email]>:
>
>> OK, forking another thread to specifically talk about Codehaus JIRA to
>> GitHub issues migration.
>>
>> Just had a quick look at Google, and the other way comes first. Not much
>> JIRA -> GH Issues... Not yet asked GH support, I suppose there might be
>> something already exisiting.
>>
>> We also want to talk about the dirty details: how to try and keep as much
>> as information we can, the comments posters id, the JIRA numbers
>> somewhere
>> to be indexable, and so on.
>>
>> Anyone having done something approaching in the past is also welcome to
>> chime in.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
>> Date: 2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00
>> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration
>> To: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>> ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
>> (and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo
>> project"
>> on
>> our website once migrated)
>>
>>
>> I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus
>>
>> what are the next steps?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
>>> then we have a few proposals:
>>> - Mojo Extras
>>> - MojoHaus
>>> - The Mojo Project
>>>
>>>
>>> I really like MojoHaus
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hervé
>>>
>>> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
>>> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form.
>>> The
>>> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and
>> used
>>> > in the Maven community.
>>> >
>>> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
>>> > Project".
>>> >
>>> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
>>> > >
>>> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for
>>> license
>>> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes
>>> at
>> a
>>> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
>>> > > rules
>>> > > are done for)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
>>> > > Codehaus
>>> > > is really wide
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Hervé
>>> > >
>>> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
>>> > > > Hello Hervé,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers
>> (who
>>> > > > are
>>> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
>>> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or
>> even
>>> > > > abbreviated - name.
>>> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say
>>> "the
>>> > > > aspectj
>>> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
>>> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
>>> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
>>> > > > (actually,
>>> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
>>> > > > Mojo
>>> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
>>> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to
>>> the
>>> > > > genereal development community.
>>> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
>>> > > > organisation,
>>> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the
>>> reason
>>> > > > that
>>> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
>>> > > > projects
>>> > > > themselves.
>>> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project
>>> should
>>> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
>>> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that
>>> we
>>> > > > should
>>> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Fair?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>:
>>> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
>>> > > > > > *Project name*
>>> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner
>> than
>>> > > > > > later.
>>> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not
>>> be
>>> > > > > > technical
>>> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we
>>> use
>>> > > > > > for
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > project.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
>>> > > > > > Codehaus
>>> > > > > > EOL
>>> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo
>> org)?
>>> > > > > > or
>>> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
>>> > > > > > btw)?
>>> > > > > > Or
>>> > > > > > change the project name even more?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to
>> be
>>> > > > > precise)
>>> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
>>> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
>>> > > > > need
>>> > > > > for
>>> > > > > "XXX
>>> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Regards,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Hervé
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > > -
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>> > >
>>> > >  
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

Jörg Hohwiller
In reply to this post by Baptiste MATHUS-4
Hi there,

I guess jira export is not the problem. GH support for automated import will be more of a challange.
In the worst case we will lose all old issues...
Creating issues via Web-API is possible with some scripting but "faking" authors and dates will IMHO not work this way...

Regards
  Jörg

Am 09.04.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Baptiste Mathus:
OK, forking another thread to specifically talk about Codehaus JIRA to GitHub issues migration.

Just had a quick look at Google, and the other way comes first. Not much JIRA -> GH Issues... Not yet asked GH support, I suppose there might be something already exisiting.

We also want to talk about the dirty details: how to try and keep as much as information we can, the comments posters id, the JIRA numbers somewhere to be indexable, and so on.

Anyone having done something approaching in the past is also welcome to chime in.

Thanks

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
Date: 2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration
To: [hidden email]


ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
(and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo project" on
our website once migrated)


I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus

what are the next steps?

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> then we have a few proposals:
> - Mojo Extras
> - MojoHaus
> - The Mojo Project
>
>
> I really like MojoHaus
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The
> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and used
> > in the Maven community.
> >
> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
> > Project".
> >
> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
> > >
> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license
> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes at a
> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
> > > rules
> > > are done for)
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
> > > Codehaus
> > > is really wide
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
> > > > Hello Hervé,
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers (who
> > > > are
> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or even
> > > > abbreviated - name.
> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the
> > > > aspectj
> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
> > > >
> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
> > > > (actually,
> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
> > > > Mojo
> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the
> > > > genereal development community.
> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
> > > >
> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
> > > > organisation,
> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
> > > >
> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason
> > > > that
> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
> > > > projects
> > > > themselves.
> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project should
> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that we
> > > > should
> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
> > > >
> > > > Fair?
> > > >
> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
> > > > > > *Project name*
> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than
> > > > > > later.
> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be
> > > > > > technical
> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
> > > > > > Codehaus
> > > > > > EOL
> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
> > > > > > btw)?
> > > > > > Or
> > > > > > change the project name even more?
> > > > >
> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be
> > > > > precise)
> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
> > > > >
> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
> > > > > need
> > > > > for
> > > > > "XXX
> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hervé
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !


smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

Jörg Hohwiller
This can be a source of inspiration for issue migration:

https://github.com/google/github-issue-mover

Am 12.04.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Jörg Hohwiller:
Hi there,

I guess jira export is not the problem. GH support for automated import will be more of a challange.
In the worst case we will lose all old issues...
Creating issues via Web-API is possible with some scripting but "faking" authors and dates will IMHO not work this way...

Regards
  Jörg

Am 09.04.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Baptiste Mathus:
OK, forking another thread to specifically talk about Codehaus JIRA to GitHub issues migration.

Just had a quick look at Google, and the other way comes first. Not much JIRA -> GH Issues... Not yet asked GH support, I suppose there might be something already exisiting.

We also want to talk about the dirty details: how to try and keep as much as information we can, the comments posters id, the JIRA numbers somewhere to be indexable, and so on.

Anyone having done something approaching in the past is also welcome to chime in.

Thanks

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
Date: 2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration
To: [hidden email]


ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
(and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo project" on
our website once migrated)


I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus

what are the next steps?

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> then we have a few proposals:
> - Mojo Extras
> - MojoHaus
> - The Mojo Project
>
>
> I really like MojoHaus
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The
> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and used
> > in the Maven community.
> >
> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
> > Project".
> >
> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
> > >
> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license
> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes at a
> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
> > > rules
> > > are done for)
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
> > > Codehaus
> > > is really wide
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
> > > > Hello Hervé,
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers (who
> > > > are
> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or even
> > > > abbreviated - name.
> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the
> > > > aspectj
> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
> > > >
> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
> > > > (actually,
> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
> > > > Mojo
> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the
> > > > genereal development community.
> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
> > > >
> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
> > > > organisation,
> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
> > > >
> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason
> > > > that
> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
> > > > projects
> > > > themselves.
> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project should
> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that we
> > > > should
> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
> > > >
> > > > Fair?
> > > >
> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
> > > > > > *Project name*
> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than
> > > > > > later.
> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be
> > > > > > technical
> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
> > > > > > Codehaus
> > > > > > EOL
> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
> > > > > > btw)?
> > > > > > Or
> > > > > > change the project name even more?
> > > > >
> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be
> > > > > precise)
> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
> > > > >
> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
> > > > > need
> > > > > for
> > > > > "XXX
> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hervé
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !



smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

Baptiste MATHUS-3
Hi,

BUT, if we want to go that way, we are gonna miss the full list of the JIRA projects id (like MBUILDNUM, and so on).
Does anyone know of a way, or could initiate a list of all the different projects ids we have?

We would then be able to script a retrieval of that XML for every projects listed. So that we can then process that later if we want to fill GH issues (I think we should).

(we could in addition ask for a DB dump, maybe people knownlegeable with JIRA operations (I'm not) could then reload it somewhere so that we can process it?)

Cheers



2015-05-04 23:34 GMT+02:00 Jörg Hohwiller <[hidden email]>:
This can be a source of inspiration for issue migration:

https://github.com/google/github-issue-mover


Am 12.04.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Jörg Hohwiller:
Hi there,

I guess jira export is not the problem. GH support for automated import will be more of a challange.
In the worst case we will lose all old issues...
Creating issues via Web-API is possible with some scripting but "faking" authors and dates will IMHO not work this way...

Regards
  Jörg

Am 09.04.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Baptiste Mathus:
OK, forking another thread to specifically talk about Codehaus JIRA to GitHub issues migration.

Just had a quick look at Google, and the other way comes first. Not much JIRA -> GH Issues... Not yet asked GH support, I suppose there might be something already exisiting.

We also want to talk about the dirty details: how to try and keep as much as information we can, the comments posters id, the JIRA numbers somewhere to be indexable, and so on.

Anyone having done something approaching in the past is also welcome to chime in.

Thanks

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
Date: 2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration
To: [hidden email]


ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
(and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo project" on
our website once migrated)


I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus

what are the next steps?

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> then we have a few proposals:
> - Mojo Extras
> - MojoHaus
> - The Mojo Project
>
>
> I really like MojoHaus
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The
> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and used
> > in the Maven community.
> >
> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
> > Project".
> >
> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
> > >
> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license
> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes at a
> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
> > > rules
> > > are done for)
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
> > > Codehaus
> > > is really wide
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
> > > > Hello Hervé,
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers (who
> > > > are
> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or even
> > > > abbreviated - name.
> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the
> > > > aspectj
> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
> > > >
> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
> > > > (actually,
> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
> > > > Mojo
> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the
> > > > genereal development community.
> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
> > > >
> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
> > > > organisation,
> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
> > > >
> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason
> > > > that
> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
> > > > projects
> > > > themselves.
> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project should
> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that we
> > > > should
> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
> > > >
> > > > Fair?
> > > >
> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
> > > > > > *Project name*
> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than
> > > > > > later.
> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be
> > > > > > technical
> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
> > > > > > Codehaus
> > > > > > EOL
> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
> > > > > > btw)?
> > > > > > Or
> > > > > > change the project name even more?
> > > > >
> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be
> > > > > precise)
> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
> > > > >
> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
> > > > > need
> > > > > for
> > > > > "XXX
> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hervé
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !





--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA to GitHub issues migration (was: Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration)

Arnaud Héritier-2
Yes we need at least to ask like Hervé did for apache projects migration : An export of data + attachments of the entire lira instance
I'm pretty sure we won't have the time to migrate somewhere else before the deadline sadly


On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Baptiste Mathus <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

BUT, if we want to go that way, we are gonna miss the full list of the JIRA projects id (like MBUILDNUM, and so on).
Does anyone know of a way, or could initiate a list of all the different projects ids we have?

We would then be able to script a retrieval of that XML for every projects listed. So that we can then process that later if we want to fill GH issues (I think we should).

(we could in addition ask for a DB dump, maybe people knownlegeable with JIRA operations (I'm not) could then reload it somewhere so that we can process it?)

Cheers



2015-05-04 23:34 GMT+02:00 Jörg Hohwiller <[hidden email]>:
This can be a source of inspiration for issue migration:

https://github.com/google/github-issue-mover


Am 12.04.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Jörg Hohwiller:
Hi there,

I guess jira export is not the problem. GH support for automated import will be more of a challange.
In the worst case we will lose all old issues...
Creating issues via Web-API is possible with some scripting but "faking" authors and dates will IMHO not work this way...

Regards
  Jörg

Am 09.04.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Baptiste Mathus:
OK, forking another thread to specifically talk about Codehaus JIRA to GitHub issues migration.

Just had a quick look at Google, and the other way comes first. Not much JIRA -> GH Issues... Not yet asked GH support, I suppose there might be something already exisiting.

We also want to talk about the dirty details: how to try and keep as much as information we can, the comments posters id, the JIRA numbers somewhere to be indexable, and so on.

Anyone having done something approaching in the past is also welcome to chime in.

Thanks

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
Date: 2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] Codehaus EOL and MOJO migration
To: [hidden email]


ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
(and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo project" on
our website once migrated)


I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus

what are the next steps?

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> then we have a few proposals:
> - Mojo Extras
> - MojoHaus
> - The Mojo Project
>
>
> I really like MojoHaus
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The
> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and used
> > in the Maven community.
> >
> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
> > Project".
> >
> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
> > >
> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license
> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes at a
> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
> > > rules
> > > are done for)
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
> > > Codehaus
> > > is really wide
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
> > > > Hello Hervé,
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers (who
> > > > are
> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or even
> > > > abbreviated - name.
> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the
> > > > aspectj
> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
> > > >
> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
> > > > (actually,
> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
> > > > Mojo
> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the
> > > > genereal development community.
> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
> > > >
> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
> > > > organisation,
> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
> > > >
> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason
> > > > that
> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
> > > > projects
> > > > themselves.
> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project should
> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that we
> > > > should
> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
> > > >
> > > > Fair?
> > > >
> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>:
> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
> > > > > > *Project name*
> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than
> > > > > > later.
> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be
> > > > > > technical
> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
> > > > > > Codehaus
> > > > > > EOL
> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
> > > > > > btw)?
> > > > > > Or
> > > > > > change the project name even more?
> > > > >
> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be
> > > > > precise)
> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
> > > > >
> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
> > > > > need
> > > > > for
> > > > > "XXX
> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hervé
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email





--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !





--
Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !

Loading...